2025-25-37190-GC · AREA TOWING v NGUYEN
23rd District Court — Balance $0.00
Taylor families deserve fair towing, transparent fees, and contracts that put residents first. The record shows a different story. Watch the video and see why Area Towing isn’t the partner our city needs.
Key issues tied to Area Towing’s footprint in our city.
Release, storage, and “administrative” add-ons that stack up fast. Taylor families shouldn’t need a loan to retrieve a car.
When the towing story is always a headache, it drains council time, erodes public trust, and leaves drivers stuck in the middle.
Transparent pricing, humane policies, and a contractor that lifts Taylor’s reputation instead of dragging it.
“Do hardworking Taylor drivers and small businesses really want Area Towing setting the rules?”
Searchable cases from the 23rd District Court (Taylor).
23rd District Court — Balance $0.00
23rd District Court — Balance $0.00
Party: AREA TOWING & RECOVERY INC — Balance $0.00
Party: AREA TOWING & RECOVERY INC — Balance $0.00
Source: 23rd District Court public case search. Dataset includes 533 entries from 1999–2025; examples above are recent filings.
Reports, hearings, and coverage related to towing in Michigan.
Coverage and commentary from local outlets and archives.
Residents ripped “exorbitant” costs while city leaders stalemated on a fix.
Internal affairs probed ties between an MSP captain and a Taylor towing owner.
City leadership reconsidered a contract after mounting criticism.
Coverage of the city’s break with a longstanding provider.
Community pushback over how towing policy is handled.
Drivers hit with steep bills after historic flooding snarled Detroit roads.
Reporting on alleged favoritism and the fallout.
Panel discussion on contract fights and towing scandals.
Headlines are for reference. Always read original reporting.
Tell Taylor’s leadership we need fair towing and transparent contracts.